A South Bronx Rail Yard Is Reborn

Mott Haven Rail Yard in 1951 and, covered by development, in 2010. (Click to enlarge.)

Much attention over the past decade has been given to two huge development projects that are underway to build above rail yards in the far west side of Manhattan and at Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn. In the midst of all of the excitement and controversy that these projects have generated, it is easy to overlook the fact that building on top of New York City rail yards has happened before. The construction of many skyscrapers in the east 40s above the rail yards leading to Grand Central Terminal is fairly well known. Much less known is a similar effort in the South Bronx’s civic district that has resulted in homes for 4,000 people, six public school buildings serving nearly 4,000 children, about 235,000 square feet of office space and 77,700 more coming soon, a supermarket, neighborhood stores, a food court, and at least 1,806 parking spaces. Let’s have a look at how this has come together.

The land in question was previously the site of the Mott Haven Rail Yard a/k/a the Melrose Yard, built by the New York Central Railroad c. 1873 and used to store and maintain freight cars, passenger coaches and locomotives. It is located south of East 161st Street between Morris Avenue to the east and Sheridan Avenue to the west, and as far south as the wye where Metro-North’s Harlem Line and the Hudson Line converge. The railroad graded the land to fit the nearby rail lines, making it 15 to 40 feet below the adjacent streets, a fact that greatly influenced the future development.

Mott Haven Rail Yard, looking northward from the 153rd Street bridge in 1937. (Click to enlarge.) Photo from the New York Public Library.

The yard helped support the New York Central’s mighty regional transportation network, with rail lines throughout the Northeast and deep into the Midwest. However, the yard was effectively a barrier between the Melrose neighborhood to the east and what today is the Grand Concourse area to the west, save for one bridge spanning the yard at 153rd Street. Starting in 1961 and continuing to today, five waves of development have thoroughly transformed this site, helping to weave together the previously sundered urban fabric. Today no trace of the rail yard remains, except for the outline it left behind in the form of the buildings that have replaced it, and the railroad’s Melrose Central Building at the southwest corner of Morris Avenue and East 161st Street, now occupied by city-run social service offices.

Wave 1: Concourse Village (1965)

Concourse Village co-op: Sun-filled balconies in modernist white-brick slabs.

The first development to take place above the rail yard was a middle-income housing development known as Concourse Village. It was originally intended to be an enormous housing development that would have blanketed the entire yards, all the way south to 150th Street, with 20 towers of each 25 stories tall. Ultimately, however, only about a quarter of that was built. An early report indicated that the railroad leased its air rights for $750,000 per year for 60 years, although later reports indicated that it was paid $7 million, presumably up front, by the project’s sponsor, the Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America. Either way, most of the construction financing came from the New York State Housing Finance Agency, which issued a $30 million loan (later rising to $36.2 million), at that time the state’s largest loan ever for housing restricted to middle-income households. The brick-and-mortar results of the ambitious transaction outlived either the railroad underneath, which merged out of existence a few years after the towers were complete, or the union, which merged in 1979 with another union to form the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, and has long since gotten out of the housing business.

The first phase of the housing, the only one to be built, was approved by the City Planning Commission in October 1960 and was projected to cost $31 million. The four phases were to begin construction every six months in 1961 and 1962. The fourth phase, to be underway as of the second half of 1962, was to be a shopping center. (As it happened, that section did get built, but decades later than originally conceived. More on that below.)

The part of Concourse Village that was built and survives to this day consists of six leviathan 25-story slab towers with 1,875 apartments, all clad in 1960s white brick and organized around a 470-space surface parking lot. This is the quintessential tower-in-the-parking-lot, cataclysmic-style development that fell way, way out of fashion after Jane Jacobs’ Death and Life of Great American Cities, which came out the same year that the concrete and iron stilts were hammered in between the still active rails for this development. It is built on a platform over what at that time was still an active rail yard. The platform was built by the Cauldwell-Wingate Company, which was simultaneously using similar techniques to build the 50-story tower, now occupied by JPMorganChase, at 277 Park Avenue, over the tracks leading to Grand Central.

The buildings started out as “integrated” housing – mixing white, black and Hispanic families. When it was first built, the Grand Concourse to the west was largely a white neighborhood, while Melrose to the east was African-American and Puerto Rican. As of 1967, the buildings were 68 percent white. But the buildings were built just at the moment that large scale white flight from the Bronx was beginning, including along the nearby Grand Concourse. By 2000, the buildings were 82% black, according to census data. Even from the beginning, whites’ allegiance to the buildings was tenuous, with some early depositors backing out when learning they’d be living in “integrated housing.” After the initial nervousness and slow co-op sales, the State declined to finance the second residential phase of the project.

There was also some early grumbling about lack of schools, which was soon to be remedied. One factor that helped fill out the buildings was the promise of new adjacent schools, completed in 1972.

Wave 2: Two Schools (1972)

One of two grade schools completed c. 1972.

There is less information available about the second wave of development, two school buildings on the south side of 156th Street. The two buildings have different shapes, but identical architecture, so I am assuming they were built at basically the same time. There is no certificate of occupancy on the Buildings Department website for the school on the east, but the school on the west, at 750 Concourse Village West (Sheridan Avenue) was completed in November 1972 according to its final certificate of occupancy, which is dated January 1978. The building on the west housed P.S. 156 (the Benjamin Banneker School) until the school closed in 2008. Today the building houses two elementary schools, the Performance School (605 students in pre-kindergarten through fifth grade) and the Global Learning Institute for Girls (154 students in kindergarten through fifth grade). The building on the east, at 250 East 156th Street, houses P.S. 31, the William Lloyd Garrison School (667 students in pre-kindergarten through eighth grade), and I.S. 151, the Henry Lou Gehrig School, (282 students in sixth grade through eighth). Together, these two buildings house four schools that enroll 1,708 students.

Many years went by before the next wave of development took place. In fact, it was 10 years after the ink dried on the certificate of occupancy for P.S. 156 that the new building permit for the next wave was filed. This wouldn’t surprise anyone even casually familiar with the history of the Bronx. This period involved the previously mentioned white flight. Notions of planned shrinkage. Redlining. Benign neglect. Every catch phrase for public-sector and private-sector policies that encouraged people to leave the Bronx for the suburbs. As a result, it was the decade the Fire Department knew as the War Years: abandonment, decay, and fires.

During these years, the area at the north end of the former rail yard was used as an 800-space parking lot for baseball fans attending games at Yankee Stadium, five blocks to the west – a hopelessly marginal use for such central land.

Wave 3: Concourse Plaza Shopping Center and Office Tower (1998)

Concourse Plaza Shopping Center

Enter Bernard J. Rosenshein, a developer who had grown up on Gerard Avenue between 164th and 165th Streets, a short walk from the site, who understood the retail potential in what was by now a woefully underserved neighborhood. In 1988, he began building the Concourse Plaza Shopping Center and a 10-story, 200,000-square-foot office tower at 198 East 161st Street that houses the Bronx District Attorney’s offices, offices for the Bronx Borough President, and others. The shopping center is anchored to the east by a large supermarket, originally Waldbaums and now Bogopa/Food Bazaar, that is tucked in behind the Melrose Central Building. The western anchor is a food court and 3,300-seat multiplex movie theater. All told, there are 32 businesses arrayed suburban-style around a surface parking lot for 251 cars (though most of the spaces are empty most of the time), and sitting atop two levels of parking below street level for another 957 cars. Up above the first floor of stores, there’s a second floor housing social security offices.

Concourse Plaza Office Tower I

Building all of this was a massive 10-year undertaking, requiring at least two levels of concrete and steel just to bring the “ground floor” up to the level of the adjacent ground. At least part of the shopping plaza opened for business in 1991 with a ribbon-cutting ceremony featuring the Borough President. But the plaza was not completed, in the eyes of the Buildings Department, until February 1998. The tower serves as a nice counterpoint to the Melrose Central Building, with the each building anchoring one end of the plaza.

This shopping center represents a revival of plans initially laid out more than two decades earlier with the development of Concourse Village. It is now owned by the Feil Organization, New York City-based owner of suburban strip malls across the country and New York City apartment buildings.

So by the completion of Concourse Plaza, the former rail yards site now supports apartments, retail, offices, and schools. And in the next wave of development, it came to support even more schools. A lot more.

Wave 4: Mott Haven Campus (2010)

The newly completed Mott Haven Campus, seen from the rear.

In December 2004, Mayor Bloomberg announced a plan to build the four new schools to serving 2,000 students at the southern end of the former rail yard. The goal was to reduce overcrowding in Bronx schools. Whereas the first three waves of development were elevated above the former rail yards through steel and concrete stilts, this is the first wave of development to be built directly on the former rail yards.

The city pledged $30 million to remediate the soil to eliminate toxins left by the former use as a rail yard, including: mercury, lead, benzene, and tetrachloroethylene. Two years later, the City Council stalled the plan over concerns about local autonomy in admissions and independent testing over the levels of toxins on site. In January 2007 the City Council allowed construction to proceed after the City agreed to the independent testing. But then in April 2007 a coalition sued the City, saying it wasn’t doing enough. The lawsuit, decided in October 2008, required the School Construction Authority to create a long-term environmental monitoring plan.

Ultimately that plan was created and the schools were built. Mayor Bloomberg and other elected officials visited the site on September 1, 2010, to cut the ribbon on the complex. Together, these schools are providing space for 1,938 students. They are the largest project ever undertaken by the New York City School Construction Authority. Just as the site’s second wave of schools expansion was wrapping up, its second wave of office expansion was beginning.

Wave 5: Concourse Plaza Office Tower II (Construction Underway)

Concourse Plaza Office Tower II

The office tower built in the 1990s at Concourse Plaza Shopping Center is reportedly completely filled to capacity, indicating unfilled demand for office space in this part of the Bronx. Reinforcing that reality is nearby Victorian style houses that have been converted into offices. In order to meet the demand for office space, Concourse Plaza’s new owners, Feil, are building a glassy second office tower with about 69,000 square feet of space at the site’s southwest corner. A construction consultant notes that the project has its own extra challenges because it is being built above utility lines that service the existing shopping center, of which it will soon be a part. At this writing, that construction is proceeding with an estimated completion date that is months away.

Superblock Review

One of the things that has always bothered me about most tower-in-the-park(ing lot) style developments is that they replaced perfectly good urban fabric that in many ways was superior to the towers. That’s not the case here. Nothing was demolished to make way for Concourse Village, since it was built in the air. So without the nagging desire to mourn what was demolished, does this instance of towers-in-the-park stand on its own as an improvement to what had come before it? Could it have been better? Answers to those subjective questions can only come from the beholder. In my opinion, the surface parking fronting 161st Street gets relatively little use. Had it been hidden behind the buildings, the retail would have been more attractive to the many pedestrians using 161st Street. I am glad to see that the Mott Haven Campus does not waste any space on parking, when there are ample subway and bus lines nearby, along with copious private parking lots and garages. In some ways, it is sad that there is no longer the demand for rail yard space at this location, but that is one small result of changes taking place at a much broader level. All in all, at the neighborhood scale, this has been a worthwhile multi-decade effort.

161st Street rezoning encourages development on Concourse Plaza surface parking. (Image: NYC Dept. of City Planning)

One wonders what the next wave of development for this site will be. With the recent up-zoning of 161st Street, one of the most attractive building parcels is the Concourse Plaza parking lot. I’d say that will be the first piece to be built upon in the next building boom.

Posted in Bronx, Development, Melrose, railroads, revitalization, urban design, urban planning | Comments Off

Welcome to Starts & Fits 2.0

Hi everyone. So, like, eight months ago Blogger stopped allowing FTP publishing, effectively ending the way I used publish this website since it stared in November 2004. So I’ve migrated this website into WordPress. Now it has a new look, as you can see. I’ll try to mess around and restore some of the old look and features.

I want to give a special thank you to Futurebird, who handled all of the unseen technical aspects of this transition.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Yankees Add Huge Amount of Bike Parking

Does someone at the Yankees read Streetsblog? Maybe someone at the NYC Parks Department? Either way, Streetsblog followed Sports Illustrated in pointing out that there was no official bike parking at Yankee Stadium, but CitiField had 10 racks. Now, bike parking has been added at Yankee Stadium — in a big way. Before I get to the big reveal, a bit of history.

Previously, the closest place to lock up a bike was on the Walton Avenue side of the Bronx County Courthouse between 161st and 158th Streets, as seen here while the Bronx was mopping up from the last snowstorm in February:

That rack is two blocks east of the stadium. It offers the capacity basically for four bikes comfortably. (You could squeeze two more in there using the Hunter College Method, which involves hoisting the front tire up over the top of the loop.)

Now, baseball fans who ride to the game will get better parking spaces than any motorist. Bike parking has been installed in the most prime spaces in the garage that has been built directly across 161st Street from the New Yankee Stadium’s main entrance. The arrow in this photo below, taken from the 4-train platform at 161st & River, points to where the bike parking is located.

Here’s a closer view of the garage, which has a park on its roof.

How much bike parking is in there? What form does it take? We’re talking about more than a couple of racks. Here’s are the best two photos I could get through the fence:

I counted 34 bike racks in the front, and another six around the corner, for a total of 40 racks. Each rack should hold four bikes comfortably, so the Yankees now have formal bike parking for 160 bikes. This seems like a great way to encourage fans to bike to the game, making what should be a natural link between healthy, invigorating transportation and watching a ball game.

And, as icing on the cake, as of last week, there is now parking for eight bikes at the new Yankees-E. 153rd Street Metro-North station (12 bikes if four people use the Hunter College Method).

Actually, make that the Yankees-E. 153rd Street Intermodal Hub.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

2009 in U.S. Passenger Railroading


The historic first train stops at Yankees-E. 153rd Street station at 5:49 a.m. on Saturday, May 23, 2009, one of many such firsts throughout the year.

2009 was a huge year for U.S. regional and intercity passenger railroads. Ridership was down slightly from 2008 because of the economy, but it was still near historic highs. At the same time, 18 new stations opened around the country, while only two closed. Here’s a rundown of the year’s activity.

February 2, 2009: Westside Express Service, a new regional rail service outside Portland, Ore., opened with five stations. This is a commuter line that allows passengers to connect to TriMet light rail at Beaverton. Other stations are Hall/Nimbus, Tigard, Tualatin and Wilsonville. Service is provided by diesel multiple units operating in married pairs.

February 6, 2009: New Jersey Transit launches Atlantic City Express Service between New York City (Penn Station) and Atlantic City.

May 11, 2009: Amtrak’s California Zephyr ceased stopping at Sparks, Nev. Which probably is not a huge loss since there is a station on this long-distance route about one minute away in Reno.

May 23, 2009: Metro-North Railroad opens Yankees-E. 153rd Street station in the South Bronx, serving Yankee Stadium on game days with up to 6,000 fans per day on three lines in its first year of operation.

July 26, 2009: New Jersey Transit opens its new station at the Meadowlands Sports Complex, serving sports fans on trains to and from Hoboken Terminal, and connecting to many lines at Secaucus Junction, including trains to New York City’s Penn Station (where fans can transfer to the Long Island Rail Road). Beginning on September 20, NJ Transit and Metro-North Railroad began offering game-day service to Secaucus Junction from New Haven, Conn., a first-ever joint service involving the two railroads that travels through three states and uses some Amtrak-owned tracks.

August 1, 2009: New Mexico’s Rail Runner Express opens Santa Fe County / N.M. 599 station.

September 9, 2009: Rail Runner Express continues its expansion, and continues the trend of trains-to-sports-complexes, by opening the Lobo Special Events Platform.

September 25, 2009: Amtrak’s Empire Builder begins serving Icicle Station in Leavenworth, Wash.

October 26, 2009: Amtrak trains begin serving a new station in New Buffalo, Mich., on the Wolverine and Blue Water trains. Across town, the station on the Pere Marquette line was decommissioned.

November 16, 2009: Northstar Commuter Rail service launched service with six stations in Minnesota’s Twin Cities area: Big Lake, Elk River, Anoka, Coon Rapids-Riverdale, Fridley, and Downtown Minneapolis Ballpark/Target Field.

November 21, 2009: Amtrak’s Cascades trains begin serving a new station at Stanwood, Wash.

What will 2010 have in store? Yonah Freemark offers some clues over at The Transport Politic.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

South Bronx Gets a New Metro-North Station


Today is Opening Day for the new Metro-North station called Yankees-E. 153rd Street, at E. 153rd Street & Ruppert Place in the South Bronx. Above is a historic image of the very first train ever to stop at the station for the public, Train No. 8700, which stopped right on time at 5:49 a.m. en route from Croton-Harmon, N.Y., to Grand Central Terminal.

Depending on how you want to look at it, this is either the first new Metro-North station to open since July 9, 2000, when Metro-North opened Wassaic and Tenmile River, or since Metro-North began service to Shore Line East’s New Haven-State Street station on June 24, 2002. Yankees-E. 153rd Street is so large it’s two island platforms each 10 cars long add 40 car lengths of simultaneous stopping potential, compared with the 12 car lengths added by the other three stations added this decade.

Back in 2006 I worried that this station wouldn’t get built, but massive new parking garages for the new stadium would. Fortunately, that did not come to pass. In April 2006, the month after that blog post, Mayor Bloomberg and Governor Pataki promised to build this station.

In October 2006, the Mets beat the Dodgers 3-0 in their National League Division Series, but subsequently lose to the Cardinals, 3-4, in the National League Champsionship Series. The Long Island Rail Road recorded 10,000 fans using the LIRR Shea Stadium stop per game, providing a reasonable benchmark for how many fans might use a station near Yankee Stadium. Meanwhile officials were moving forward with a plan to build four new parking garages for the new stadium that would together contain 4,931 parking spaces.

On May 23, 2007, the MTA Board approved a contract for the station construction.

On August 30, 2007, a Garage D with 1,145 parking spaces was dropped from the parking garage construction plan and Garage B was reduced by 176 spaces. The reason cited was “rising costs,” but one hopes that this came about in part because of the understanding that less parking would be needed thanks to this new station.

On October 9, 2007, the New York City Industrial Development Agency issued $237.6 million in bonds to finance the construction of three parking garages that together will contain 3,610 spaces, and to renovate and/or reconfigure existing garages and lots containing another 5,517 spaces.

Today, May 23, 2009, at 5:49 a.m., two years to the day after the Metro-North station construction was signed, the station entered public service.

Total cost for the construction project, which includes two 10-car-long island platforms, four elevators to ensure ADA compliance, and numerous cool electronic signs on the platforms and in the large mezzanine, was $91 million. Total cost to build 3,610 new parking spaces and maintain the existing 5,517, was $237.6 million. Because the new garages are being build on sites previously occupied by parking lots, and because some of the reconfiguration involves removing spaces to make way for new parklands, the net increase in parking spaces form this project I calculate to be 2,788 spaces. The money for this project was fronted by bondholders, who will be exempt from paying an estimated $2.5 million in City income taxes, $5 million in State income taxes and $51 million in Federal income taxes. The Empire State Development Corporation added an additional $70 million grant for the parking garage construction, bringing the total cost of the parking project up to $307.6 million. The bondholders will be repaid with revenue earned from parking fees charged at the stadium.

So for all those who complain about the cost of the new station, which was paid for through $39 million from the City and $52 million from the MTA (including contributions totaling less than $5 million from Assemblywoman Carmen Arroyo, Assemblyman Jose Rivera, and Congressman Jose Serrano), it is worth noting the relative costs and functionality of the station and the parking.

A net increase of 2,788 parking spaces costs $307.6 million. (Most of it raised from the private sector, with incentives from the City, State and Federal governments. Between the forgone taxes of $58.5 million and the Empire State Development Corporation grant of $70 million, there was $128.5 million in public funds or lost revenue contributed to this project.) If the average vehicle occupancy for baseball fans is 2.65 to 2.75 as noted in the new stadium’s environmental impact statement, these 2,788 new parking spaces would serve between 7,388 to 7,667 game day fans.

The train station, projected to serve between 6,000 and 10,000 fans per game, cost just $91 million. Of course, the new garages will contribute to pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, neighborhood asthma and traffic congestion, while the new station helps alleviate those ills. And the new station provides a year-round mobility benefit to South Bronx residents, while most of the garage spaces are closed except on game days.

The moral of this story? Building parking is expensive! Parking spaces that will serve a comparable number of people as a large new train station requires a larger taxpayer subsidy than the station.

Posted in Bronx, Metro-North, Yankee stadium, parking construction | 1 Comment

2008: A Boom Year for U.S. Passenger Railroads

Two thousand eight may have been a bad year for the economy, but it was a great year for the United States’ passenger railroads, notwithstanding the horrific crash in Chatsworth, Calif., on Sept. 12 that killed 25 people.

Nearly every U.S. railroad showed big ridership gains in 2008. Those at the bottom of the list below tend to be big-city, big ridership operations already, which means that movement up or down will tend to be muted because the denominator in the calculations is already a large number. Gasoline prices increased rapidly through July, accounting for much of this, of course, but ridership did not decline along with the gasoline price collapse that began in mid-July. This upholds the conventional wisdom that once people try the train, they stick with it.

Railroad Service Territory Jan.-Sept. YOY Ridership Change
Sounder Seattle region +26.79%
Rail Runner Express Albuquerque region +24.90%
Tri-Rail Miami-Ft. Lauderdale region +24.64%
Shore Line East New London, Conn., to Stamford, Conn. +17.45%
Altamont Commuter Express (ACE) San Jose to Stockton, Calif. +17.16%
Caltrain San Francisco Peninsula, San Jose +12.69%
Trinity Railway Express Dallas-Ft. Worth +11.76%
SEPTA Regional Rail Philadelphia region +11.22%
Amtrak National intercity +11.11%
Metrolink Los Angeles region +10.04%
Virginia Railway Express Washington, D.C., Virginia suburbs +8.97%
Coaster San Diego to Oceanside, Calif. +7.25%
MARC Washington, D.C., Baltimore, suburban Maryland
+6.30%
MTA Metro-North Railroad New York City, northern suburbs, Connecticut +5.18%
NJ Transit New York City & northern New Jersey, Philadelphia to Atlantic City +4.82%
MTA Long Island
Rail Road
New York City, Long Island +4.40%
Metra Chicagoland +3.77%
MBTA Commuter Rail Boston region +1.69%
South Shore Line Chicago to South Bend, Ind. -0.43%
FrontRunner Salt Lake City to Pleasant View, Utah N/A
Music City Star Nashville to Lebanon, Tenn. N/A

Statistics courtesy of the American Public Transportation Association and Amtrak.

In terms of infrastructure, 12 new passenger rail stations were opened in 2008 where none had existed before, and three inferior stations were replaced with improved new ones.

The trend of new station openings should continue until next year, as the Portland-area Westside Express Service is scheduled commence operations in February with five new stations. Right here in the South Bronx, Metro-North’s new Yankee Stadium station, with game day service on all three of Metro-North’s main lines, and daily service on the Hudson Line, is scheduled to open in the spring.

Will ridership trends continue upward? In a faltering economy with fewer job opportunities and hence, need for commuting and travel in general, quite possibly not. However, with car repossessions all over the country turning two-car households into one-car households, it’s possible that the railroads will be an increasing presence in the lives of those lucky enough to live in the regions they serve.

Posted in Amtrak, commuter rail, passenger rail, railroads, regional rail | 1 Comment

Three Layers of Housing Development in East New York Expose Society’s Priorities


The neighborhood of East New York, Brooklyn, offers an interesting window into the changing values of American society over the 20th and early 21st centuries, as expressed through architecture. The different types of buildings that exist there trace the neighborhood and city from optimistic heyday to a society that had retreated from the public realm and turned inward, to the current revitalization.

Walking around the neighborhood it is clear that there have been three types of urban growth to be built over the years. I’ll describe each one and speculate about what the architecture says about the people who built each layer.

Layer 1: Early 20th Century Row Houses

The first wave of major development came during the first three decades of the 20th century between the 1903 opening of the Williamsburg Bridge and the opening of the BRT subway c. 1908 and the IRT subway in 1922. The photo at the top shows examples of the residences built during these years: two story rowhouses often with wide porches. Here’s another photo.

These porches provided the occupants of each building with a front-window into neighborhood life and social interaction. Today’s residents have maintained the tradition by putting chairs up. These sturdy buildings, flush with and enclosing the street, stood for some sixty years. Then the neighborhood entered the crisis decades in New York’s history, the 1960s and 70s, with the associated white flight from the city, arson, high crime and general mayhem and urban decay. One intellectual current during this time was the notion of “planned shrinkage” advanced by Roger Starr, which advocated curtailing city services (like police and fire protection) to neighborhoods like East New York and the South Bronx that by the 1960s had a low-income population. The goal was to allow these neighborhoods to lose population so that there would be enough money to keep the city center flourishing.

For further reading on planned shrinkage and the crisis decades more broadly, see Jill Jonnes, South Bronx Rising; Walter Thabit, How East New York Became a Ghetto; Deborah and Rodrick Wallace, A Plague on Your Houses; Roberta Brandes Gratz, The Living City (ch. 7 on planned shrinkage, ch. 8 on urban dispersal); and many others.

The policies did what they were intended to do, and by the 1980s, East New york was filled with blocks and blocks of empty lots, with just a few scattered buildings remaining. But lo and behold, people still needed homes, and people still wanted to live in East New York.

Layer 2: 1980s to Today: The Nehemiah Houses

All this empty land tempted officials like Ira D. Robbins into large-scale development representing a kind of suburbanization of formerly urban land, similar to but not quite as egregious as what happened at Charlotte Street. This is what Jane Jacobs would condemn as “Cataclysmic Development,” or too much development happening at one time. But worse, she would say, not only was it large scale, it was too low density, lacking in the concentration of people needed to create that inherent advantage that the city enjoys over suburbia: a robust and active street life.

Robbins was aware of Jane Jacobs’ ideas about what makes a healthy city, and it seems they touched a nerve. He called her and those with similar ideas: “ignorant, neurotic, dishonest, slanderous, disorderly, and disgusting.”

And when Kathryn Wylde, then president of the NYC Housing Partnership, suggested that infill and rehabilitation would be preferable to clearance and mass-production, he replied that such thinking was “the legacy of the soft, muddle-headed Jane Jacobs cult of the 60′s.” So the result is the Nehemiah Houses. Block after block of low-density sameness that makes it difficult to build more vibrant neighborhoods that could house more people.

Monotonous and cheap, the Nehemiah Houses, worse, are withdrawn from public space not only by the fact that they are set back from the street but from the fact that, though they are often within walking distance to public transportation, they encourage occupants to zip in and out without seeing one another via use of the private car.

Here is how they look side by side with the first layer of housing growth.

But these houses represent more than the will of a handful of folks who prefered a particular type of construction. They represent broad societal changes, too. Between the4 1920s and the 1980s there had been a broad reordering of priorities. Twin technologies had come that would destroy the type of public culture embodied by rowhouses with porches. The first has been described by George W.S. Trow, in the New Yorker as: “Television — slayer of movies, slayer of radio, slayer of popular magazines, slayer of every form of human activity and inactivity except itself.”

Gone is the streetscape as provider of entertainment and facilitator of neighborhood interaction. The porches disappeared as now too expensive. The people withdraw into isolation inside their homes, lured inward by TV and Nintendo and pushed inward by fears of crime now that the informally policing “eyes on the street” provided by porch sitters are gone. Without the need for a porch the space in front of the building is given over to that second community-destroying technology: the private automobile, slayer of the streetcars, slayer of the passenger railroads, slayer of walking, slayer of every form of human transportation and recreation except itself.

It is worth repeating, that these houses are an improvement over the rubble-strewn empty lots that immediately preceded them, as if that says anything. And they began encouraging low-income homeownership in an honest way decades before the proliferation of subprime mortgages would do so dishonestly.

Between 1982 and 2006, some 2,900 of these land-gobbling single-family houses have been built in East New York. That’s about 2,800 too many. These both encourage further development by improving the neighborhood (over the empty blight that had been there), and preclude it by using up all available land.

Thankfully, that plan seems to be ending now as the housing shortage continues and housing officials are looking to higher density residences to alleviate it.

Layer 3: Today’s Apartment Buildings: The Neighborhood Restored

Here are 48 new apartments on Malta Street and Alabama Avenue, completed last fall on a lot that had not been used for Nehemiah. These buildings represent the latest wave of housing construction in East New York, one that recognizes that in a city, you build up if you want to house all the people who who want to live there, and who make the city great. These buildings show that there is a great need for housing in urban neighborhoods. If we had just been able to preserve the first generation and avoided the massive flight to the suburbs, the housing already there would have been more elegant and community-oriented that what we are building now. But what we’re doing now is a great step forward.

Posted in East New York, Jane Jacobs, architecture, housing, urban design, urban planning | 2 Comments

Amtrak Update I

Still no word from Amtrak on whether we’ll get sleeper compartments to Chicago on October 10 & 11. Don’t worry. I know you’re all on pins and needles wondering what will happen. I’ll keep you updated every single step of the way.

Just to recap the situation:

Capitol Limited: Booked
Cardinal: Booked
Lake Shore Limited: Booked

Back on July 26 & 27 we tried to book tickets on trains to Chicago departing Oct. 10, but the roomette bedrooms were booked solid. So we’re on the waiting lists for all three trains to Chicago, but haven’t heard whether anyone has canceled.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Trying to Get to Chicago


The Lake Shore Limited travels through Hastings, N.Y. (Photo by David Sommer via RRPictureArchives.net.)

My wife, Susan, and I just got invited to a wedding in Chicago on Oct. 11, two and a half months from now.

The Three Rivers hasn’t run since 2005, but there are still four ways to get from New York City to Chicago by train, which is the way we like to travel. Four good routes give us options, but we still have a problem.


1) The easiest and most direct way is via the Lake Shore Limited, a 959-mile route along the southern edges of Lakes Ontario, Erie and Michigan. Despite the proximity to the lakes, the most scenic part of this route is at the beginning, when you travel along the Hudson River between New York and Rensselaer. You leave Penn Station in afternoon and travel through Upstate New York until the sun goes down. You have dinner around Schenectady and sleep through until you’re in Ohio farm country west of Toledo. After a great breakfast, you’re refreshed and ready for your day in Chicago.

The second and third routes both involve transferring to the Capitol Limited, an overnight train between Chicago and Washington. The chief difference between these routes is where you transfer.

2) In the second route, you take the Pennsylvanian, a mid-range route without sleepers that runs between New York and Pittsburgh. You leave at ten minutes to 11 in the morning, have lunch around Philly and pull into Pittsburgh just after eight o’clock. There is a three-hour layover in Pittsburgh, so you should quell your hunger long enough to get dinner in downtown Pittsburgh. Does anyone have any restaurant suggestions? Then the Capitol Limited rolls in just before midnight. If you’re lucky enough to have a sleeper, you can fall asleep and wake up in rural Indiana just in time for a complimentary breakfast. This gets you into Chicago at 8:40 if the train’s on time. This route is actually shorter than the Lake Shore Limited, only 925 miles. But it takes longer because you have to change trains.

3) In this route, you get on the Capitol Limited at the beginning of its route a few blocks from the U.S. Capitol. There are any number of hourly Northeast Regional or Acela trains that will get you to Washington, so which one you take depends on how much time you want to spend there. The Capitol Ltd. leaves at just after four o’clock in the afternoon.

4) The fourth route is the longest (1,147 miles) and most infrequent because it runs only three days a week. But you ride the Cardinal the entire way, so there’s no need to change trains, and you get to see appalachia up close and personal. You leave New York City at a quarter to seven in the morning, get breakfast, lunch and dinner on the train as you watch the landscape roll by. You’re in West Virginia by dusk, and the train chugs through the West Virginia mountains and travels along banks of the Ohio river before pulling into Cincinnati’s grand Union Terminal well past midnight. This station is every bit as elegant, sturdy and timeless as Grand Central Terminal. But where as Grand Central serves more than 3,500 trains per week, Cincinnati’s Union Terminal serves exactly six, and they all come through between the hours of 1 and 4 a.m. So ou sleep through Cinncinati and wake up in Indianapolis, or if not, rural Indiana. Breakfast aboard the train, as with the other routes, leaves you refreshed and ready for your day in Chicago.

Our wedding isn’t until October 11, but I wanted to book as early as possible, because the trains have been running very full lately, and Susan and I like to travel in the sleepers for long trips like this one. There is nothing like sleeping in a real bed as you travel through the night. Fortunately, we’re leaving New York City on a Friday, so we have the Cardinal as an option as well.

Unfortunately, the sleeping cars are sold out on all three of the trains that have them (the Pennsylvanian is a day train with coaches only). Let me emphasize as of today, July 27, 2008, the status of sleeper roomettes for trains to Chicago on Friday, Oct. 11, 2008:

Lake Shore Limited: sold out.
Capitol Limited: sold out.
Cardinal: sold out.

So we’re booked in coach for now (via Pittsburgh) and on the waiting list for a roomette. Between now and October, surely someone will cancel his or her reservation, right?

So does anyone out there care to speculate as to which train will have an opening first? Will we be traveling through Buffalo in October, or Pittsburgh, or maybe Cincinnati? Anyone want to wager as to when I might get that phone call from Amtrak telling me we’ve got an upgrade?

I assure you, readers, that if and when we do get that call, you will be the first to know. In fact, you’ll be able to read about it only here, at Starts & Fits. No other media outlets will carry this information.

Posted in Amtrak, Capitol Limited, Cardinal, Lake Shore Limited, Pennsylvanian, trains | Comments Off

An Introduction


Delays at O’Hare. (Scott Olson/Getty Images via The New York Times)

Bad news for the airline industry today. American Airlines cancels 1,094 flights, causing by-now-familiar airport havoc so the FAA can inspect questionable wiring. Getting new planes to help in situations like these will be harder than everybody thought. And earlier this week, three U.S. airlines, Skybus, A.T.A. and Aloha, cancelled all of their flights, permanently. On top of that, Oasis Hong Kong Airlines shut down today as well.

Of all today’s stories of stranded passengers, this one stood out:

At La Guardia Airport in New York, Yoree Koh, arrived and like thousands of other across the country found her American flight, to Chicago, canceled. Ms. Koh, 25, had planned to attend an orientation for the graduate journalism program at Northwestern University that she will attend, and to look for apartments.

She missed those appointments. An American worker told her to come back at 6:00 a.m. Thursday to get on a standby list for a 12:40 p.m. flight.

“I’m not holding my breath,” Ms. Koh said. “It basically ruined my week.”

Ms. Koh, get your week back. Allow me to introduce you to the Lake Shore Limited. Lake Shore Limited, Ms. Koh.


The Lake Shore Limited at Cold Spring, N.Y. (David Sommer / RRPictureArchives.net)

Instead of trying her luck at the airport the next day, she should have gotten to Penn Station by 4 p.m. and for $80 been at Chicago by 9:45 a.m. Sadly, at that time, she’ll still be in New York, on line.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off